#4 Novelty w/ Patrick Heckeler

Of course, an invention needs to be “novel” to be patentable. But does any difference over the prior art do the trick? Or does there have to be a technically relevant difference? I sat down with Patrick Heckeler to discuss a recent EPO decision involving that question.

Patrick’s profile πŸ‘‰ https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-patrick-heckeler/

This is a recording of a talk on Clubhouse. Shout-outs go to the panelists who spontaneously made great contributions:

  • Martin Wilming πŸ‘‰ https://www.linkedin.com/in/mwilming/
  • Barış Atalay πŸ‘‰ https://www.linkedin.com/in/bar%C4%B1%C5%9F-atalay-86a14a22/
  • Preston Richard πŸ‘‰ https://www.linkedin.com/in/prestonrichard/

Next European Software Patents Talk on clubhouse: https://www.joinclubhouse.com/event/mJzA6Rzo

Video version on YouTube

You can watch the video version on YouTube or listen to the audio-only version on your favorite podcast platform.

Links mentioned in this episode

I’m excited for your feedback. Let me know in the comments if you found value in this information!

Talk to you soon,

P.S. To get notified when I upload a new episode, get on my private email list.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.